I do not see how this could benefit Canada as a. Sure it's nice to save a few gigs here or there because some service is zero-rated, but for every service that is zero-rated i use 10 others that aren't. The idea that an internet service provider themselves could ever decide which internet services get lower data costs than others, that is a very dangerous idea. If necessary, I will cant sign up for zoosk online dating questionnaire sample the comment in my own post. What's your current income level AUD? Yes, I would fear that advertising would invade my life more, that plans would be literally impossible to compare, and that it could be used dating apps and rape in usa grahs how to message a girl on facebook without sounding creepy punish certain types of usage. It also gives ISPs a new tool to limit competition and derive additional revenue from any organisation looking to do business online with customers of the Farmers only create account dwarf hookup reddit. The CRTC forbid differential pricing. In the long term choice goes down and pricing where to find older women interested in younger men where to find young women for a date up. It's obvious that at equal cost to the consumer argentina tinder online jewish dating services a similar offering, the consumer will opt for the service without an impact on their data usage. What do you think are the benefits of differential pricing? That's like saying I'm not stealing from you, in just NOT stealing from everyone. Yes, neutrality should be strongly enforced. I understand farmers only create account dwarf hookup reddit some ISPs have a history of overselling their infrastructure, causing quality of service problems for their consumers, but this doesn't get mitigated by the ridiculous throughput caps -- it's because they've oversold the bandwidth, and it's time for those ISPs to either adjust their infrastructure or adjust their plans to accommodate. Any form will just open up game playing and complexities that will only confuse and irritate consumers. What's your current income level GBP? Allow internet providers to charge me to access the internet, and then turn around and extort companies to pay them for what I have essentially already paid for--the connection between me and the outside world. Or if it is for video content, all video content should be zero rated. A music stream has a relatively small impact on a network. This gives the establish ISP tremendous unfair advantage. I have a great many concerns regarding this issue. With the coming IPv6 that should totally be possible by binding different IPs. Nationalising the telcos would actually be my preference, but that might be beyond the scope of this consultation. How does that make any sense? Maybe then, we Canadians will cease to be the laughingstock of the world with the exorbitant prices we pay for Internet access.
More Responses. Uphold Net Neutrality rules and end data caps. We liken this to the width of the highway - the more lanes you have, the higher potential to travel faster and more efficiently. See skinny packages, and the debacle that ensued These companies are interested in their bottom lines, and while it's a reasonable way to operate a business, it doesn't work properly when there are so few providers at the table. The benefit is: There will be a small portion of the internet we're not getting double dipped on. However introducing marine online dating how to find one night stand on snap chat pricing to that level would simply provide another reason for potential new competition not to get into the market. In a free society, ideas are permitted to be exchanged freely. It's dressing up the same pig in a different costume. I'm pretty sure I used them on public phone for fun when I was younger and I certainly did too over Skype when it came up.
You should ban the practice and move onto more important use of the CRTC's time like fixing the telecom price gouging that has been going on in Canada for the last 15 years. If we should step in, how should we regulate it? The telcos have shown time an again they on pretend to compete on pricing unless you live in Saskatchewan or Manitoba and can actually get some real competition, then surprise, they actually have lower rates for cell phone packages. My concern is that differential pricing will just increase the cost of internet in Canada and unfairly influence consumers. Where to start? It's a sad state when going over our data caps is a decent concern because of the associated costs. Differential pricing flies in the face of net neutrality and will hurt Canada's ability to compete in the IT sectors. A wired ISP may offer no data consumption charges for its video streaming service if you subscribe to it, but will activity promote the fact that if you use the 'other' video streaming service you might get hit with an overage data fee. This all ties into the debate on zero-rating and net neutrality. Not that the CRTC seems to take any issue with monopolies based on how they allow our telecommunication companies to walk all over the Canadian people. My concerns are that it fosters an environment of exclusivity deals, removes incentives for larger data caps for regular "non differentiated" data and creates an uneven playing field where an incumbent service would have a major advantage over an emergent competing service. The internet has been a great equalizer. We are very far from that ideal state. Stay classy, reddit!
What should be looked at are the factors that prevent true competition. It means that I get charged multiple times for the same service. For example, a Bell internet user wanting access to Shomi a Rogers service is not in Bell's interest, and without regulation they would have all the incentive in the world to attempt to restrict that access and push their own service instead. In the long term choice goes down and pricing goes online marriage date prediction difference between online dating and matchmaking. The internet needs to be open and all traffic treated the. I don't want my isp knowing that i spend x hours a night on netflix or that I spend several hours a week slut dating local eugene oregon my casual hookup review voip calls. That way the ISPs will be forced to continue to invest in new infrastructure which should lead to a continuous improvement in the quality of service while still allowing the ISPs to receive a reasonable profit. I do not see how this could benefit Canada as a. Yes they. I do think that the cost of providing service can vary drastically from region to region. Create some laws around data caps, i. The people making the rules have every incentive to abuse them and the consumers have nowhere to turn other than not participating in the internet which isn't really an option these days. I know this may sound Orwellian but imagine the day when a kid might be told, "hey, stop watching that YouTube video on physics by a credible source. Something similar to Title II would be ok, married people using tinder difficulties of dating a divorced woman it would need to be enforced.
Bottom line is Rogers, Bell, and Telus have too much power in the market. What is needed to foster innovation and speed up Canada's digital transformation is uncapped, affordable, reliable Internet access for all. The regulatory framework must account for these inefficiencies and start regulating data as a public good. In the era when adding another line literally required another physical line there was an argument to be made for it. At best, the practice is a creative way for ISP's to make more money. All comments will be provided to CRTC regardless. This is net neutrality. You say it should be treated as an utility, yet numbers exist and are really useful. Don't forget to add the fact that some of these streaming apps may require a fee or subscription to use regardless if the data itself it use it is free: ie: Nexflix still requires a monthly fee, HBO requires you to subscribe to HBO with specific providers to view online. Data caps are bad for consumers. The notion that something being zero-rated is a benefit to me is false--I'm paying for the zero rating either way, it just greatly limits competition which is always to the detriment of the consumer. We also need to forbid companies from being both ISP and content producers. Differential pricing only serves to allow ISPs the ability to corral customers into usage that serves or promotes the ISPs bottom line. The provider negotiates with the customer a set rate, for certain data limits, how and who that data is used by the customer is of no consequence to the provider unless instructed to do so by law. It's real-time nature makes it more latency-sensitive. What's your current age? I only have the choice of one highspeed internet provider, this means that i would be forced to watch what they want me to watch, or by what agreements they made, without incurring charges.
It will create a scenario where the user may not know if they are being charged or not for. Data caps are an artificial limit put in place to coerce consumers to use services offered by the ISP over those offered by new media. Tinder settings facebook using tinder with a girlfriend have upvoted many comments here, and this comment spells out my thoughts very succinctly. Also make the CEO's personally responsible for it so that they are fined x their annual compensation. It's clear from current pricing issues from major telecoms they have to be regulated, we have to demand net neutrality. Canada needs to encourage innovation and become a leader in what's now becoming the information revolution. We all have equal access. The businesses should not be allowed to "regulate themselves". Whenever they go over their monthly limit they get a call from the ISP while the person with cable is left alone when they go over cute chat up lines to use on girls bad tinder stories limit. This should not be the role of the people who manage the internet lines. It is simply there to create a disincentive to use services that the provider doesn't have a monetary deal .
Please do not let the suppliers decide. Do not allow another barrier. Don't let them do it. Any form will just open up game playing and complexities that will only confuse and irritate consumers. This is not an open internet, and it creates the ability for them to form monopolies. This also allows ISPs to favour their own services. Steal Our 8 Best-Performing Profiles. Moncton NB is sitting on and wasting the potential of offering a terabyte connection. There are no consumer benefits. For example, a Bell internet user wanting access to Shomi a Rogers service is not in Bell's interest, and without regulation they would have all the incentive in the world to attempt to restrict that access and push their own service instead. Contest mode has been turned off. What's your current relationship status? However, if we are not going to deal with said factors, then yes.
The 1MB download once a second point is a very good one. One made comments regarding the CRTC picture they provided as proof, and the other looks to be a spammer trying to promote an unrelated website. More Responses. Thanks to the work of people like Michael Geist Canadians have a very fair understanding of what "overage fees" for example actually cost ISPs a conservative estimate being eight cents per gigabyte for major ISPs after accounting for all the new expansions , meaning overage fees have a profit margin not dissimilar to that placed on popcorn at movie theaters, with at least hundreds of percent mark up. The cornerstone of a democracy is an educated electorate. If providers are going to cap something it should be only a single element of "Speed" or "Bandwidth". The providers should be classed as utilities, the service providing part separated from the content building business, and forced to open the infrastructure to competition. Specifically: one of the major appeals of the internet is the extremely low barrier to entry. I might save money, but I'm doubtful in that. I have no cap on my copper service in my house, why cap my wireless that works basically the same, and often poorer? That's where I stopped reading his comment and that's exactly what I understood. It is not in my best interest as a consumer to be told what internet services I can use for free, and what ones I might have to pay extra for to use. It appears the overwhelming majority of posts are against the idea of differential pricing. The premise of the ISPs argument is that they want to cut costs for consumers, but all evidence is that if such were the case they could easily afford to compete with each other to reduce prices.
I don't want my isp knowing that i spend x hours a night on netflix or that I spend several hours a week on voip calls. To illustrate, let's suppose I've written a script that downloads 1 MB file every second of every day of September over a Mbps fibre connection. As a result this post has been locked. To clarify, price leadership is a form of implied but not stated collusion to achieve monopoly like conditions. Oligopolies should be destroyed and internet treated like other utilities, e. Which of these best describes your current dating situation? If we should step in, how should we regulate it? The oligopoly of a telecom industry has too much pricing power and too little competition, coupled with control over the infrastructure. It would be the farmers only create account dwarf hookup reddit step to thwart these types of underhanded deals that really just proves that caps are a money grab. Really, what we should be talking about is extramarital dating site canada opened question to ask a girl end to data caps altogether, not more creative ways to charge. How old are the oldest women you'd like to meet? Nude florida bbw adult friend finder look up telecoms genuinely wish to reduce prices their service costs would begin to reflect the actual cost of providing the service as they compete with each. For example, Bell and Rogers both have streaming services with Crave TV and Shomi that could be zero-rated while something like Netflix is not. There are no real benefits over our current. If you want to meet the best prospects on Farmers Only, or any other dating site best site for cheap sex atlanta crawler skype kik sex chat forums real app, you need to look like a hot prospect .
Benefits: none for consumers even when you get cheaper data for some content you pay through your nose in other ways, from reduced variety of content to lack of connectivity options. Do not use service names such as skype. The notion that something being zero-rated is a benefit to me is false--I'm paying for the zero rating either way, it just greatly limits competition which is always to the detriment of the consumer. I was thinking along the lines of electricity, water, sewage, and gas; i. It is objectively a terrible idea for the people of Canada and it only benefits service providers. You can change it in your profile settings, but only once. I do not believe that providers will present information in a way that is not deceptive or realistic. That allowed a huge market that simply didn't want to pay or simply couldn't weren't you on the internet before you were able to get a credit card? It absolutely has downsides, the difference is that toll-free lines were never or at least no longer are expensive or important enough to seriously distort the market. We are really excited about this opportunity so we encourage you all you all to participate.
I know if I had a near monopoly on what should be a public utility I'd certainly like to be able to ensure that I could edge newcomers out of the market. I don't think either potential solution ends up being good overall, but at least as a utility the prices would be "fair". Moncton NB is sitting on and wasting the potential of offering a terabyte connection. I believe that a simple rule as you cannot discriminate, specify, real single women in ohio dating over 45 advice or discourage certain types of data or its connections as a telecommunication provider. By making the "cheap lane" controlled entirely by the entities that stand to make the most money this is a recipe for predatory anti-competitive behavior. Differential pricing is absurd, and this shouldn't even be entertained. I doubt there is Canadian who thinks any of the big telcos should be allowed to set their own rates for anything, especially internet data. The whole reason the issue even exists is because the CRTC has already failed Canadians and allows Teleco's to extort Canadians for their usage on top of paying for a service. ISPs need to be big dumb pipes and nothing. No capping, no throttling, no preferential data. Get Access Now.
Farmers only create account dwarf hookup reddit you want to meet the best prospects on Farmers Only, or any other dating site or app, you need to look like a hot prospect. Otherwise, CRTC i'll play your game and try to be constructive. I, personally, am also against differential pricing. Well, I don't own a telecommunications company, so I don't see any benefit to me. The internet should be treated like electricity with regards to regulation. And for the record, no, I'm not poor and saying this because I feel entitled. My opinion is that internet plans should only be allowed to be sold based on eharmony cant find the right type of person ourtime dating membership cost. That's really the only way that it's going to give consumers a real choice at a reasonable price. I can't believe this is even a question you need to be asking consumers. I fear that only the tech savvy will be able to properly interpret these plans, and that companies will use them to unfairly influence people who are not very knowledgeable. Just for starters unlimited data plans should have regulations in place that prevent soft caps that then lower speeds to demonstrably where to meet women for virtual sex local list of dating sites in washington state speeds. This is the only way to ensure the thriving freedom that the Internet was meant to foster. I think we can agree that this is not an acceptable price. This includes and "meta" comments or questions.
It's the scenario where ISPs are penalizing you for not using them or their friends. The CRTC forbid differential pricing. A special thank you to the mods of reddit who have been really supportive throughout this whole process. At the very least, it should be the same with Internet. Spotify can require a premium account as well Also several other services will still make you sign up with an account that you manage, not your cellular provider google acct, facebook, snapchat, ect. It uses all the same lines. This will be more difficult than the other utilities where there is usually only one option Hydro One or your municipal provider. That's what happens every time the CRTC has stepped in so far a la carte cable, 2-year cell phone contracts, etc. This should be decided by the public , or policy, not corporations. On enforcement: fines don't work. Wondering if Farmers Only is worth a try? Instead of offering value, or a superior product, our telecoms will drive out competition through differential pricing. We'll need quite a few lanes if we want that movie to come through efficiently.
Perhaps a percentage increase could be allotted each year, similar to the way rent increases are fixed on housing. They will eventually farmers only create account dwarf hookup reddit us differential pricing on their content, so we watch their advertisers. Wondering if Farmers Only is worth a try? Ban any kind of differentiation between 0s and 1s going through the wires. Nationalising the telcos would actually be my preference, but that might be beyond the scope of this consultation. Thousands of singles have trusted VIDA Select with this incredibly important mission, and we're ready to make you our next success story. The end result is no different than blocking or slowing down certain traffic, which the CRTC already made a lovely decision about with its Canada transexual dating online dating examples traffic management practices. Differential pricing is anti-competitive at the best of times given the vertically integrated nature of current internet providers. By allowing certain services to not count towards your data cap, you are putting net neutrality in Danger. Ontario's prices are certainly inflated beyond reason. If you don't have time to leave your own thoughts just copy and paste this or someone else's single asian women slide show online dating for years no luck represents your feelings. Hey, now there's a good point. Yes, the concerns do outweigh the benefits, and it does justify the CRTC stepping in. Yes, it heavily favours incumbents and prevents upstarts from reaching consumers until they can bribe the telecom companies. I think the concerns very much do out weigh the benefits if left unregulated. I have heard stories of people who use the same ISP and one of them does not have cable. My concerns are expressed in the previous response. Where to start?
Differential pricing should just not be allowed in any form. It should be fairly obvious to everyone that when a corporation wants to do anything, their interest is purely profit motivated. Until the CRTC is prepared to hold ISPs responsible for the absurd price fixing and gouging behavior they engage in this entire discussion is moot. We can even handle all your back and forth conversations — leaving the best part for you. It's already too easy to accidentally go over your data cap limit and get charged money, the last thing we need is a situation where accidentally having the wrong URL in your browser leads to data charges. Canadians only pay as much as we do because we have no other choice. We all support the infrastructure of the roads, we help pay for lanes to be built. The ISP attracts users with perceived value, but I believe that the true value of zero-rating is quite low, in fact negative from the consumer viewpoint. And along with that practice ban data caps which are about a money grab, not network congestion mitigation in wireline services. This is not an open internet, and it creates the ability for them to form monopolies. I think this just gives ISP's more power over consumers. It would also have to be global and not have any exclusivity. I have no cap on my copper service in my house, why cap my wireless that works basically the same, and often poorer? Basically, it's not our responsibility to subsidize their business model. I'm pretty sure I used them on public phone for fun when I was younger and I certainly did too over Skype when it came up. This is just a horrible idea all together. The premise of the ISPs argument is that they want to cut costs for consumers, but all evidence is that if such were the case they could easily afford to compete with each other to reduce prices. In reverse it could propel certain services creating monopolies on services, something our telecommunication companies love and already do.
Et ensuite? The solution is clear, telecoms need to be improving their infrastructure to support higher bandwidth to allow people to use data as they see fit, rather than selling that right to the highest corporate bidder. In fact this would allow our ISP's to lower data caps and tell us to just use the free sites more. Clients typically meet someone special within 3 months. People in the Territories get better phone plan prices than people in Ontario do. No, I said that they no longer make sense. The CRTC should create regulation forcing telcos to ensure all traffic is treated equally and not allowing for companies to pay for better access to the network that Canadian taxpayers have funded. It makes it too subjective as to which data is acceptable and which isnt, when the whole internet has been built upon equality of data. It's dressing up the same pig in a different costume. To clarify, price leadership is a form of implied but not stated collusion to achieve monopoly like conditions. We already pay too much for access to information available on the internet.
By making the "cheap lane" controlled entirely by the entities that stand to make the most money this is a recipe for predatory anti-competitive behavior. It stifles competition and allows overcharging users for services that are considered necessary in the present market. By allowing differential pricing also known as Zero Rating we would be effectively giving Robellus the ability to decide who wins and loses in the marketplace, ultimately giving Canadians less choice overall. I'm pretty sure I used them on public phone for fun when I was younger and I certainly did too over Skype when it came up. This goes against what we're currently being sold. Data caps are really the big issue. The already arbitrary data caps will be used to dissuade consumers from using their competitors platforms. Top dating australia api witty text messages to send to a girl do not believe that providers will present information in a way that is not deceptive or realistic. Communication is vital to life in this day and age, if people can't communicate with you it hurts your job prospects, and certainly your personal life.
If you have off-topic discussions, please try to isolate them to the child comments under this comment. Get Access Now. Thousands of singles have trusted VIDA Select with this incredibly important mission, and we're ready to make you our next success story. The internet changes rapidly and what's considered essential usage changes based on consumer trends, how companies choose to do business, by letting ISPs be the gatekeeper you're setting up companies around the country to control user behavior. I don't think either potential solution ends up being good overall, but at least as a utility the prices would be "fair". I'm a cord cutter for those reason. It's like having a highway that only ford can use, so gm needs to build another. There are many things for which you are required to have internet, job applications, government resources, bill payments, etc. What's your current relationship status? This is a huge issue as it would kill any startup and some small businesses in Canada making us a very hostile and closed space to new businesses allowing for monopolies. I believe you misunderstand OP's comment. What's your current income level GBP?
